The Sitka School District will have counselors at each school next year, thanks to a windfall of federal money. When the Sitka Assembly met on Tuesday (6-23-20) it voted to split over $450,000 in unexpected Secure Rural Schools funding between the city and the district.
The decision was not without some debate. The city has already decided to split next year’s Secure Rural Schools funds with the school district, but this funding came through at the last minute — for this year.
Member Richard Wein argued that the city should keep the entire amount for road repairs, while the school district should find a way to use CARES Act funding to pay for its needs.
“I would heartily support additional monies to the school district. They need to be, I think, a lot more creative and I think they can be,” he said. “And if they meet some needs through the monies from the CARES Act, they can shift those funds.”
Mayor Gary Paxton voted against the split on the first reading two weeks ago, but had a change of heart. He said he would reluctantly vote to share the funds with schools, even though the city reduced its budget by $2 million dollars for 2021, and more budget challenges are coming down the pike.
“So it’s ‘Come to Jesus’ time here and I don’t know how we’re going to do it, but we need the town to know that with this vote we’re helping our school district,” he said. “But we’re going to have to be in a position to find out how we’re going to pay for our roads.”
The assembly voted 5-2 in favor of dividing the funds evenly, with members Valorie Nelson and Richard Wein opposed.
How to handle federal funding for schools wasn’t the only disagreement at Tuesday’s meeting, but the other was more akin to a courtroom drama.
In this case, Nick Feronti, of the Northern Justice Project, was appealing the city’s denial of his public records request. Feronti had asked for information on a police department investigation that involved former detective Ryan Silva, whom he had represented in a recent whistleblower suit against the department. Feronti argued that access to those records was a fundamental right.
“It shouldn’t be controversial for a citizen to ask for basic public documents about a vague investigations that are arguably retaliatory,” said Feronti.
Feronti didn’t state why Silva was being investigated by police, however , Silva himself suggested that it involved his ex-wife.
“She and I, even though we’re going through a custody argument, we talk regularly,” Silva said. “She is completely open with me and the police department responded to her house at my request back in January. So yes, I know about the incident that happened then.”
City attorney Brian Hanson said the records shouldn’t be released since the investigation is active. And he said the police department actually passed the investigation over to another team.
“Our police department has turned it over to the state troopers,” he said. “You know why we turned it over to the state troopers? Just for this reason. Because we knew there would be claims of conflict of interest, claims of “ginning up” things. We want this all above board,” he continued. “And then, Mr. Silva may not be charged.”
Ultimately the assembly voted 6-1 to deny Feronti’s appeal with member Richard Wein opposed.
Read more coverage of Tuesday’s Sitka Assembly meeting here: